Risk & Fraud
Intelligence & RiskPhase 1Lead: Risk Orchestrator Agent
Architecture Pattern
View full details →Risk signals are evaluated in parallel (SEON, IP analysis, behavior patterns, device fingerprint). Results feed an evaluator-optimizer that refines risk scores.
Foundation. Withdrawal automation and fraud prevention are day-one requirements. Blocks wallet automation.
Tools
Goals
Agent Sizing Rationale
10 agents: 1 orchestrator + 5 risk assessment (odd for high-stakes fraud voting) + 4 investigation (including OSINT). This is the highest-stakes department — Condorcet theorem shows 5-agent panels achieve >99% accuracy when individual accuracy >70%.
Risk Assessment (5-agent voting panel)
Investigation & Action (4 specialists + orchestrator)
Agents Used From Other Departments
These agents from other departments feed data into or are called by this department's agents.
Player LTV and segments help distinguish high-value players from fraudsters to reduce false positives.
Transaction data is the primary signal for fraud detection.
Flagged accounts may trigger CS outreach for verification.
AML flags from Risk feed into compliance reporting. Suspicious activity reports (SARs) are filed through Compliance. KYC verification outcomes inform risk scoring.
Bet pattern analysis for match-fixing detection requires sportsbook odds and settlement data. Unusual betting patterns trigger risk investigations.